Last night I had all the ingredients to make two Victorian desserts, and I decided to charge forward despite the fact that I was pretty sure the houseguest I was cooking for this weekend was going to cancel. It’s been about a month since I made a feast or even a simple meal. I am mindful of the passage of time because the menus are starting to reflect local spring ingredients like asparagus.
Now that I am about a fourth of the way through my year of Victorian cooking, I am able to reflect on how it’s going and what I’m getting out of it. I feel lucky that I read Beeton’s newest and most comprehensive biography first. It gave me fair notice that she did not test even a fraction of the recipes before she slammed them out in serial form. This historical document I have been planning parties around was once just another sheisty Victorian moneymaking scheme.
So how’s that working out for me? What am I getting from this? A lot of stomachaches. Fun, in that new-recipe way. I am doing a lot of personal research around the recipes and ingredients, and that always gives me a boner.
One feeling I get very strongly is that it would be nice to have Beeton’s rewritten with care and edited judiciously by someone who actually gives a shit about cooking. The extant abridged version cuts pages and menus off willy-nilly, sometimes in mid-menu. The recipes that the menus suggest are not included in the abridged one, which is more poor editing and proof that it has just become a crusty historical document. Though, to be fair, sometimes my unabridged version cross-references recipes that do not actually exist (looking at you, Sorrel Sauce), and I think if I was creating a book in serial form with 1200+ recipes without the aid of a computer, I would be fucking shit up left, right, and center.
I find myself editing some of the recipes as I go, since generally it pains me to waste or ruin food. I followed her advice on baking apples (something I rarely do) last night and ended up with applesauce. Franny says it is delicious.
Some of the recipes I would cut all together, like the “French” forcemeat recipe that calls for calf udder. Many of the recipes are interesting from a historical perspective, but I wonder if some of them were passed over even when the book was new. Why make forcemeat that requires boiling calf udder for hours and then pushing it through a sieve when you could make the simple one that calls for yummy bacon?
Anyway, the short answer is that I have no regrets about starting this project. My regrets center more around the fact that work has become exponentially more stressful in the past month, something I did not see coming at all, and I am trying to do that work-life balance thing. The best part of my day yesterday was making accidental applesauce and a lemon custard that did not thicken and probably will never set, while Franny sat around and played string games and talked to me. I was grump all day and cheerful after that. Tonight I will do my best not to ruin dinner, and I suppose I will make a quick gluten-free cake for dessert instead.
I think I will change tack though. If something sounds wrong to me, I am going to have to modify it a little, while still keeping the spirit of things. I cannot pour out another unset dessert.
I concur that you should adjust as you go, especially since some of the recipes just go against everything I’ve ever learned especially concerning vegetables. And yet, then there are the new techniques and tastes you might miss out on (calf udder!).
I finished Short Life/Long Times in January, then had to return to the library due to “title level hold”, just got it back and I’m diving back into The Queen’s Scullery ballstothewall sotospeak.
I think I may try to find some of the pre-Victorian cooking books from which Beeton copiously copied.
Hi, look at M. Ude’s and Eliza Acton’s books on Google Books. Beeton yoinked stuff whole cloth, as her bio said, but it is fun to see.
You should write a book proposal!